Surveillance footage from a truck stop can be valuable evidence in a Georgia truck accident case. It may capture a vehicle’s movements, a driver’s condition or activity before a trip, or the events surrounding a collision in a parking area. Because a truck stop is usually owned by a business that is not a party to the lawsuit, accessing that footage involves the rules governing subpoenas to non-parties. This guide explains how Georgia law addresses that situation.
Why Footage Held by a Non-Party Requires a Subpoena
In a lawsuit, parties exchange information with each other through discovery requests directed at the opposing side. A truck stop, however, is typically a non-party. It is not the plaintiff and not the defendant. Information in the hands of a non-party generally cannot be obtained through ordinary party discovery requests. Instead, the law uses the subpoena, a court process that compels a non-party to provide testimony or produce documents and things.
Surveillance footage is treated as a record or thing that can be the subject of a subpoena for production.
The Georgia Subpoena Framework
Georgia provides for subpoenas to produce documentary and other evidence in O.C.G.A. § 24-13-23, the provision addressing a subpoena for the production of documentary evidence. This type of subpoena, historically called a subpoena duces tecum, commands a person to produce designated records or items.
The Civil Practice Act also addresses subpoenas in connection with depositions. Under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-45, a subpoena may be issued for a person to be deposed and may also command that person to produce documents and things. In practice, a party seeking truck stop footage may use a subpoena directed solely at producing the recording, or may pair a request for the footage with a deposition of a custodian of records who can authenticate it.
A subpoena duces tecum is directed at a non-party. It is not the mechanism used to obtain materials from someone who is already a party to the case, since party materials are reached through ordinary discovery.
How the Subpoena Is Issued and Served
A subpoena must be issued and served in the manner Georgia law prescribes. Service is generally accomplished by personal delivery or by other methods the statutes permit, such as registered or certified mail with return receipt requested in appropriate circumstances. The subpoena must give the recipient adequate notice and a reasonable time to comply.
A truck stop, like other businesses, is often served through a designated person or agent who can receive process on its behalf. The subpoena identifies the footage sought with enough specificity that the business can locate and produce it, often by reference to a date, time range, and camera location.
Limits on a Subpoena: Reasonableness and the Motion to Quash
A subpoena to a non-party is not unlimited. The recipient of a subpoena for production may file a motion to quash or modify it. Georgia courts will limit or set aside a subpoena that is unreasonable or oppressive.
Common grounds raised by a non-party include that the subpoena is overly broad, that it lacks specificity, that it imposes an undue burden, or that compliance would require disclosure of privileged or confidential material. A request for footage spanning an excessive period, or for recordings unrelated to the incident, is more likely to draw an objection than a narrowly framed request tied to the relevant time and location.
When a motion to quash or modify is filed, the court balances the requesting party’s need for the evidence against the burden and any legitimate concerns of the non-party. The court may enforce the subpoena, narrow it, or set it aside.
The Problem of Footage Retention
A practical issue with surveillance footage is that it is often retained only for a limited time. Many systems overwrite recordings automatically after a set period, sometimes a matter of days or weeks. A subpoena cannot produce footage that no longer exists.
Georgia recognizes a duty to preserve evidence, but that duty arises when litigation is reasonably foreseeable to the party in control of the evidence. A truck stop that has no notice of a potential claim may not be under any obligation to preserve a recording before it is overwritten in the ordinary course.
Georgia law has an additional limitation here. The Georgia Court of Appeals has declined to recognize an independent cause of action for spoliation of evidence by a third party. A truck stop that overwrites footage in the routine operation of its system before receiving any notice of litigation generally cannot be sued separately for the loss. Because of this, Georgia courts and commentators have noted that obtaining a court order directing preservation early in litigation is the recognized way to protect evidence held by a non-party, rather than relying on the non-party’s own initiative.
Using the Footage Once Produced
Footage produced under a subpoena still must satisfy the rules of evidence before it can be used at trial. The recording generally must be authenticated, often through a custodian who can describe how the system records and stores video. Questions of relevance and admissibility are decided under the Georgia evidence code. A subpoena delivers the footage into the case, but separate evidentiary requirements govern whether and how it reaches a jury.
Summary
Parties in Georgia accident cases can use subpoenas to seek truck stop surveillance footage because the footage is held by a non-party business. The subpoena for production of documentary evidence under O.C.G.A. § 24-13-23, and the deposition subpoena power under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-45, provide the mechanisms. The subpoena must be properly issued and served and must not be unreasonable or oppressive, and the truck stop may move to quash or modify it. A significant practical limitation is footage retention, since recordings are often overwritten quickly, and Georgia does not recognize a separate claim for third-party spoliation, so a court order directing preservation early in the case is the accepted way to protect such evidence.
Disclaimer
This article is provided strictly for general educational and informational purposes. It is intended to explain how Georgia law works as a matter of public legal education, and it does not constitute legal advice, a legal opinion, or a recommendation about any particular course of action. Reading this article, or contacting the website on which it appears, does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and any law firm, attorney, or author.
The law changes over time. Statutes, regulations, court rules, and judicial decisions discussed here may have been amended, repealed, superseded, or reinterpreted after the date of publication, and citations to specific code sections or cases reflect the law only as it was understood when this article was written. The application of any legal principle also depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of an individual matter, and outcomes vary from case to case.
For these reasons, no one should rely on this article as a substitute for advice from a licensed Georgia attorney who can review the particular facts involved. The author and publisher make no warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or applicability of the information provided, and disclaim any liability for any action taken or not taken based on this content.