Electronic logging devices, or ELDs, are the in-cab systems that commercial trucks use to record a driver’s hours of service. Because hours-of-service compliance and driver fatigue are central issues in many truck accident cases, ELD data is often a focus of discovery. A common question is whether Georgia has its own special protocols for obtaining and examining that data. The accurate answer is that the substance of ELD recordkeeping is set by federal law, while the procedure for obtaining ELD data in a Georgia lawsuit is governed by Georgia’s general discovery rules rather than by a Georgia statute written specifically for ELDs.
The Federal Source of ELD Requirements
ELDs exist because of federal regulation. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, requires most commercial drivers subject to the hours-of-service rules to use an ELD to record their record of duty status. The ELD rule is found in the federal regulations governing hours of service.
These federal regulations also set retention obligations. A motor carrier is generally required to retain a driver’s records of duty status and supporting documents for six months, and a back-up copy of ELD records is to be kept on a separate device for the same period. This six-month federal retention period is significant in litigation because a crash and a lawsuit do not always occur within that window, and data that is not preserved beyond six months may simply no longer exist unless something triggered a duty to keep it longer.
The content, format, and retention of ELD data are therefore creatures of federal law. Georgia does not have a separate state ELD recordkeeping regime that displaces these federal rules.
Discovery Procedure: Georgia’s General Rules
When ELD data is sought in a Georgia state court lawsuit, the tools used are the ordinary discovery devices of the Georgia Civil Practice Act. There is no special ELD-only discovery statute. The same rules that govern any electronically stored information govern ELD data.
A party may serve requests for production seeking ELD records, the underlying raw data files, and related materials. Interrogatories may be used to identify the ELD system, the provider, the data custodian, and the carrier’s data practices. Depositions may be taken of the driver, of corporate representatives knowledgeable about the carrier’s ELD system and recordkeeping, and of records custodians. Subpoenas may be directed to nonparties, such as a third-party ELD vendor that hosts or stores the data. The general standard is that parties may obtain discovery of any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the action, and ELD data bearing on a driver’s hours and fatigue ordinarily fits that standard.
ELD data is electronically stored information, so the principles Georgia courts apply to electronic discovery apply here. That includes attention to the form in which data is produced. A printed summary log is not the same as the native electronic file, and the native data can contain edit histories, location records, engine data, and other detail not visible on a printout.
Preservation and Spoliation Under Georgia Law
Although the procedure for examining ELD data is general, one area of Georgia law is especially important in this context: the doctrine of spoliation, the destruction or failure to preserve evidence relevant to pending or reasonably foreseeable litigation.
Under Georgia law, a duty to preserve relevant evidence arises when litigation is pending or is reasonably foreseeable to the party in control of the evidence. Notice of potential litigation can be actual or constructive. Georgia courts consider various circumstances in deciding whether a party should reasonably have anticipated litigation, including the type and severity of the injury, how clear fault appears, the potential financial exposure, the relationship and conduct of the parties, and how often litigation follows similar incidents.
This matters for ELD data because of the six-month federal retention period. If a serious truck crash makes litigation reasonably foreseeable to a motor carrier, Georgia’s preservation duty can require the carrier to retain ELD data even though the federal regulatory retention period might otherwise allow it to be discarded. In practice, an injured person’s representatives often send a preservation letter, sometimes called a litigation hold notice, early on, identifying ELD and related electronic data and asking that it be preserved. Such a letter is a means of establishing actual notice and reinforcing the preservation duty.
When relevant ELD data that should have been preserved is lost or destroyed, Georgia courts can impose spoliation sanctions. The available remedies range in severity. They include excluding evidence or precluding a party from contesting certain facts, instructing the jury that it may presume the lost evidence was unfavorable to the party that failed to preserve it, and, in serious cases, entering judgment against the spoliating party. The choice of sanction rests with the trial court, which considers factors such as whether the loss prejudiced the other party, whether the party acted in bad faith, and whether a lesser sanction can cure the prejudice. A spoliation inference is not automatic; it is a remedy the court may impose after evaluating the circumstances.
Authentication and Admissibility
Obtaining ELD data is one step; using it at trial is another. ELD records, like other electronic business records, are subject to Georgia’s Evidence Code provisions on authentication and hearsay. A party seeking to introduce ELD data typically must lay a foundation showing what the data is, how it was generated and maintained, and that it is what it purports to be, often through testimony of a custodian or a knowledgeable witness. These are general evidentiary requirements, not ELD-specific protocols, but they apply whenever ELD data moves from the discovery file into evidence.
Conclusion
Georgia does not have discovery protocols written specifically for electronic logging device data. The existence, content, and six-month retention of ELD records are governed by federal motor carrier regulations. Obtaining ELD data in a Georgia case is accomplished through the general discovery tools of the Georgia Civil Practice Act, treating ELD data as electronically stored information. The most Georgia-specific dimension is the law of spoliation: because Georgia’s duty to preserve attaches when litigation is reasonably foreseeable, that duty can require a motor carrier to retain ELD data beyond the federal retention window, and the failure to do so can lead to court-imposed sanctions evaluated under Georgia spoliation principles.
Disclaimer
This article is provided strictly for general educational and informational purposes. It is intended to explain how Georgia law works as a matter of public legal education, and it does not constitute legal advice, a legal opinion, or a recommendation about any particular course of action. Reading this article, or contacting the website on which it appears, does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and any law firm, attorney, or author.
The law changes over time. Statutes, regulations, court rules, and judicial decisions discussed here may have been amended, repealed, superseded, or reinterpreted after the date of publication, and citations to specific code sections or cases reflect the law only as it was understood when this article was written. The application of any legal principle also depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of an individual matter, and outcomes vary from case to case.
For these reasons, no one should rely on this article as a substitute for advice from a licensed Georgia attorney who can review the particular facts involved. The author and publisher make no warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or applicability of the information provided, and disclaim any liability for any action taken or not taken based on this content.