The interaction between Georgia’s general two-year personal injury statute of limitations and the special tolling provisions for minors creates a distinct timing framework when a child is injured in a motor vehicle collision. This guide explains the statutory provisions that govern the deadline, how tolling works for minors, and what aspects of a child injury claim are not tolled and therefore proceed under the standard timeline.
The Baseline Two-Year Period Under O.C.G.A. 9-3-33
Georgia’s general statute of limitations for personal injury actions is set by O.C.G.A. 9-3-33, which provides that actions for injuries to the person shall be brought within two years after the right of action accrues. The statute also provides a four-year window for loss of consortium and a one-year window for injuries to reputation. In a standard adult collision case, the two-year clock starts on the date of the crash and ends on the second anniversary of that date.
This baseline period applies to most claims arising from motor vehicle collisions, including bodily injury and pain and suffering claims. Property damage to the vehicle itself follows a four-year window under O.C.G.A. 9-3-32.
Tolling for Minors Under O.C.G.A. 9-3-90
For minors, Georgia tolls the limitations clock. O.C.G.A. 9-3-90 provides that infants and persons who are legally incompetent at the time the cause of action accrues are entitled to bring the action within the same time after the disability is removed as is prescribed for other persons. Minority is removed at age 18 under O.C.G.A. 39-1-1.
The combined operation of O.C.G.A. 9-3-33 and 9-3-90 gives a child injured in a Georgia crash until two years after turning 18 to file a personal injury claim, effectively until age 20. A five-year-old injured today therefore has until approximately age 20 to file a personal injury action, while a 17-year-old has until approximately age 20 (a much shorter tolling benefit because most of the tolling period has already passed).
The tolling rule applies to the minor’s own claims for personal injury, including pain and suffering, lost future earning capacity, permanent impairment, and disfigurement. The Georgia Supreme Court has consistently held that the minority tolling provision is liberally construed to protect those who lack legal capacity.
Claims That Are Not Tolled
Several claims related to a child’s injury proceed under the standard, non-tolled timeline. Understanding which claims are tolled and which are not is central to the limitations analysis.
The parent’s claim for medical expenses incurred for the care of the injured child is a separate, derivative claim. Under Georgia case law, this claim belongs to the parent and accrues when the expense is incurred. It is not tolled by O.C.G.A. 9-3-90 and runs under the standard two-year period for personal injury or four-year period for accounts, depending on its characterization. Decisions including Cooley v. Lewis, 144 Ga. App. 829 (1978), and progeny have treated the parent’s loss claim as subject to the adult limitations rules.
Wrongful death claims arising from a fatal injury to a minor are governed by O.C.G.A. 51-4-2 and a two-year limitations period under O.C.G.A. 9-3-33. The Georgia Supreme Court in Lovett v. Garvin, 232 Ga. 747 (1974), and later cases addressed the application of limitations to wrongful death actions. Tolling provisions interact with wrongful death actions differently than with personal injury actions brought on behalf of a surviving minor.
Claims against governmental entities have notice and limitations rules that may not be tolled in the same way as private-party claims. The ante litem notice requirements under O.C.G.A. 36-33-5 (municipalities) and O.C.G.A. 50-21-26 (state) impose short notice deadlines. The Georgia Supreme Court in Cobb County v. Williams, 295 Ga. 250 (2014), addressed the application of minor tolling to ante litem notice deadlines, generally holding that the tolling statute does not extend ante litem notice periods.
Property damage claims to the vehicle the child was riding in run under the four-year period in O.C.G.A. 9-3-32 and belong to the vehicle owner, not the child.
How Insurance Claim Timing Differs From Limitations Timing
A claim filed with an insurance carrier is governed by the policy contract, not the tort statute of limitations. Most Georgia auto policies require prompt notice of a loss and cooperation with the carrier’s investigation. Failure to provide timely notice may give the carrier grounds to deny coverage even if the underlying tort claim against the at-fault party remains within the limitations period.
Uninsured motorist coverage under O.C.G.A. 33-7-11 includes its own notice requirements. The statute requires the UM carrier to be served as an unnamed party in any tort action against the uninsured or underinsured driver. Failure to comply with the service requirement can foreclose UM recovery.
Hospital liens under O.C.G.A. 44-14-470 must be filed within strict timeframes after services are rendered. Medical providers, hospitals, and ambulance services may assert liens that attach to any recovery from a third party.
Settlement Approval Under O.C.G.A. 29-3-3
When a minor’s claim resolves through settlement, Georgia imposes court approval requirements based on settlement size. Under O.C.G.A. 29-3-3, as amended by House Bill 620 effective May 2, 2022:
Gross settlements of $25,000 or less do not require court approval or appointment of a conservator. The natural guardian may receive and hold the funds for the minor’s benefit.
Gross settlements exceeding $25,000 with net settlements (after fees, costs, and liens) of $25,000 or less require court approval but not appointment of a conservator. The probate court or the court in which any litigation is pending has exclusive approval jurisdiction.
Gross and net settlements both exceeding $25,000 require appointment of a conservator and court approval.
These approval requirements add procedural steps that take time to complete. A settlement reached close to a limitations deadline may face logistical pressure if approval is required.
Evidence Preservation Across the Tolling Window
Although the minor’s claim is tolled until age 20, evidence preservation is most effective close to the date of the crash. The Georgia Uniform Motor Vehicle Accident Report (Form SR-13) generated under O.C.G.A. 40-6-273 is created at the scene and is the most reliable contemporaneous record. Police agencies retain reports for varying periods, often several years, but availability is not guaranteed indefinitely.
Event Data Recorder downloads from involved vehicles capture pre-crash data under 49 C.F.R. Part 563, but the data is accessible only while the vehicle remains intact. Vehicles repaired or destroyed within the tolling window may lose EDR availability.
Third-party video footage, including business surveillance, traffic cameras, and dashcams, has retention periods often measured in days or weeks. Preservation letters sent shortly after the crash secure footage that would otherwise be overwritten.
Medical records are retained under HIPAA and state retention rules for periods typically measured in years. Pediatric records carry extended retention obligations under O.C.G.A. 31-33-1 and related provisions, often until several years after the patient reaches majority.
Witness memories degrade with time. Statements taken shortly after the crash, whether captured in the SR-13, recorded by adjusters, or memorialized in affidavits, are more reliable than statements gathered years later.
Comparative Fault and Children
Georgia’s modified comparative negligence statute, O.C.G.A. 51-12-33, applies to minor plaintiffs. The fault analysis examines whether the child’s conduct contributed to the injury. Children are held to a standard of care appropriate to their age, intelligence, and experience under Georgia common law. Very young children, generally those under age six or seven, are typically considered incapable of negligence as a matter of law under Georgia case law, including decisions following the framework in cases such as Brewer v. Gittings, 102 Ga. App. 367 (1960).
When a child is a passenger, contributory negligence is rarely at issue. When a child is a pedestrian, cyclist, or operator of a vehicle (such as an unlicensed minor on a moped), age-appropriate fault analysis may apply.
Summary
Georgia’s framework for child injury claims combines the general two-year limitations period under O.C.G.A. 9-3-33 with the minor tolling provision under O.C.G.A. 9-3-90, extending the minor’s filing window until approximately age 20. Parent claims, wrongful death claims, governmental-entity claims, and property damage claims operate under separate, generally non-tolled timelines. The settlement approval rules under O.C.G.A. 29-3-3, evidence preservation realities, and the comparative fault framework under O.C.G.A. 51-12-33 all interact with the limitations analysis to shape the practical timeline of a child injury claim in Georgia.
Disclaimer
This article is provided strictly for general educational and informational purposes. It is intended to explain how Georgia law works as a matter of public legal education, and it does not constitute legal advice, a legal opinion, or a recommendation about any particular course of action. Reading this article, or contacting the website on which it appears, does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and any law firm, attorney, or author.
The law changes over time. Statutes, regulations, court rules, and judicial decisions discussed here may have been amended, repealed, superseded, or reinterpreted after the date of publication, and citations to specific code sections or cases reflect the law only as it was understood when this article was written. The application of any legal principle also depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of an individual matter, and outcomes vary from case to case.
For these reasons, no one should rely on this article as a substitute for advice from a licensed Georgia attorney who can review the particular facts involved. The author and publisher make no warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or applicability of the information provided, and disclaim any liability for any action taken or not taken based on this content.