A fatal dog attack can give rise to a wrongful death claim in Georgia, and a property owner may be among the parties who can be held responsible. Whether a particular property owner can be sued depends on that owner’s relationship to the dog and to the place where the attack occurred. Georgia law identifies two distinct theories that can apply: liability as the owner or keeper of a dangerous animal, and liability as the owner or occupier of land where a dangerous condition existed.
The Dog Liability Statute
The primary statute governing injuries caused by dogs is O.C.G.A. section 51-2-7. It provides that a person who owns or keeps a vicious or dangerous animal, and who by careless management or by allowing the animal to go at liberty causes injury to another person who does not provoke the injury, may be liable in damages to the injured person. When such an attack causes death, this statute supplies the underlying tort that can support a wrongful death claim.
Two features of the statute are central. First, it reaches not only the owner of the animal but also a keeper of it. A keeper is generally a person who has undertaken to manage, control, or care for the animal. A property owner who harbors or keeps a dog, even one the owner does not formally own, can fall within the statute. Second, the statute applies to a vicious or dangerous animal, and Georgia law has developed standards for proving that element.
Proving the Animal Was Vicious or Dangerous
Historically, Georgia required proof that a dog had a known dangerous propensity, often summarized by the idea that an owner is on notice after the animal has shown aggression. O.C.G.A. section 51-2-7 also provides an alternative path. The statute states that it is sufficient to show that the animal was required to be on a leash or at heel by a local ordinance, and that the animal was not on a leash or at heel at the time of the attack. In communities with a leash law, proof that the dog was loose in violation of that ordinance can satisfy the dangerousness element without separate proof of a prior incident.
The statute also requires that the injured person did not provoke the attack. Provocation by the victim is a recognized issue under the statute.
A Property Owner as Owner or Keeper
A property owner can be sued under O.C.G.A. section 51-2-7 when that owner is the owner or keeper of the dog that caused the death. This is the most direct path. If the property owner owned the dog, or kept and harbored it on the property and exercised control over it, the owner can be a proper defendant in a claim arising from a fatal attack, provided the statutory elements of dangerousness, careless management or allowing the animal at liberty, and absence of provocation are met.
A separate question arises when the property owner is a landlord who does not own or keep the dog, such as when a tenant’s dog causes the death. Georgia law treats a landlord’s responsibility narrowly. A landlord who is out of possession is generally not liable as a keeper for a tenant’s dog merely because the dog lives on the rented property. Landlord liability in that situation depends on more specific circumstances recognized by Georgia courts, such as the landlord’s knowledge of a dangerous animal and a degree of control over its presence. The mere status of being the landlord does not by itself create liability.
Premises Liability as a Separate Theory
Apart from the dog liability statute, Georgia recognizes premises liability. An owner or occupier of land owes a duty of care to people who are lawfully on the property. Where a death occurs because of a dangerous condition on the premises that the owner knew about or should have known about, a premises liability theory may apply. In the context of a dog attack, this theory can become relevant when the property owner had control over the premises and knowledge of the danger posed by a dog kept there. The premises liability analysis depends on the status of the victim, the owner’s knowledge, and the owner’s control of the property.
The Wrongful Death Framework
When a dog attack causes death, the claim proceeds within Georgia’s wrongful death framework. The wrongful death claim belongs to the statutory survivors, such as a surviving spouse and children, and seeks the full value of the life of the decedent. A separate estate or survival claim may seek the decedent’s own pre-death losses. Georgia’s general statute of limitations for wrongful death is two years from the date of death, subject to recognized tolling rules. Comparative negligence principles can apply, so conduct of the decedent, such as provoking the animal, can affect a recovery.
Summary
A property owner can be sued for a wrongful death caused by a dog attack in Georgia when that owner is the owner or keeper of the dog under O.C.G.A. section 51-2-7, meaning the owner harbored or controlled a vicious or dangerous animal that, through careless management or being allowed at liberty, caused the death without provocation. Violation of a local leash ordinance can help establish the dangerousness element. A property owner may also face a premises liability claim where a dangerous condition on the land contributed to the death. A landlord who neither owns nor keeps a tenant’s dog faces liability only in narrower circumstances recognized by Georgia courts.
Disclaimer
This article is provided strictly for general educational and informational purposes. It is intended to explain how Georgia law works as a matter of public legal education, and it does not constitute legal advice, a legal opinion, or a recommendation about any particular course of action. Reading this article, or contacting the website on which it appears, does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and any law firm, attorney, or author.
The law changes over time. Statutes, regulations, court rules, and judicial decisions discussed here may have been amended, repealed, superseded, or reinterpreted after the date of publication, and citations to specific code sections or cases reflect the law only as it was understood when this article was written. The application of any legal principle also depends heavily on the specific facts and circumstances of an individual matter, and outcomes vary from case to case.
For these reasons, no one should rely on this article as a substitute for advice from a licensed Georgia attorney who can review the particular facts involved. The author and publisher make no warranty, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or applicability of the information provided, and disclaim any liability for any action taken or not taken based on this content.